1. Home
    1. Dashboard
    2. Search
  2. Forum
    1. Unresolved Threads
    2. Members
      1. Recent Activities
      2. Users Online
      3. Team Members
      4. Search Members
      5. Trophys
  3. Articles
  4. Blog
  5. Videos
  6. Jobs
  7. Shop
    1. Orders
  • Login or register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • Blog Articles
  • Products
  • More Options
  1. Robotforum - Support and discussion community for industrial robots and cobots
  2. Forum
  3. Industrial Robot Support and Discussion Center
  4. Fanuc Robot Forum
Your browser does not support videos RoboDK Software for simulation and programming
Visit our Mainsponsor
IRBCAM
Robotics Channel
Robotics Training
Advertise in robotics
Sponsored Ads

Mount angle with robot wall mounted.

  • Shellmer
  • June 20, 2023 at 4:45 PM
  • Thread is Unresolved
  • Shellmer
    Reactions Received
    52
    Trophies
    5
    Posts
    161
    • June 20, 2023 at 4:45 PM
    • #1

    Hi.

    I have a problem with one robot when the robot brakes are released, it falls a little and sometimes gives a collision warning but only in T1. End efector weight is less than 2kg, the piece it grips weights almost nothing and Payload is set and correct.

    It's a LrMate 200iD/7kg that is mounted on a wall, I've checked the variable where the mounting angle was stored and it was at 0, so I changed it to 90 through controlled start and mainteinance menu but this is still happening.

    Robot with 0° on all axis is pointing up, connectors from the base are pointing to the floor, it's tightened and do not move and the structure do not vibrate.

    After running the setup and changing the mount angle to 90, I've searched on the mechanical unit manual where it describes how the mounting angle is calculated but the way it's mounted it should be "-90" degrees instead of 90. In theory values accepted are 0-180, but if I put -90 it accepts and it shows on $Param_group[1].$mount_angle the -90 but problem still happens so I'm not sure if it's doing anything.

    I really do not understand very well how this works since in theory if robot was mounted to the wall with the front part pointing to left or right instead of up/down from the floor, gravity forces would be different and with that configuration will not be taken into account... is there any more thing or config I should change other than this?

    Thanks in advance.

  • Bout_de_ficelle
    Reactions Received
    14
    Trophies
    1
    Posts
    52
    • June 20, 2023 at 5:07 PM
    • #2
    Quote from Shellmer

    Hi.

    I have a problem with one robot when the robot brakes are released, it falls a little and sometimes gives a collision warning but only in T1. End efector weight is less than 2kg, the piece it grips weights almost nothing and Payload is set and correct.

    It's a LrMate 200iD/7kg that is mounted on a wall, I've checked the variable where the mounting angle was stored and it was at 0, so I changed it to 90 through controlled start and mainteinance menu but this is still happening.

    Robot with 0° on all axis is pointing up, connectors from the base are pointing to the floor, it's tightened and do not move and the structure do not vibrate.

    After running the setup and changing the mount angle to 90, I've searched on the mechanical unit manual where it describes how the mounting angle is calculated but the way it's mounted it should be "-90" degrees instead of 90. In theory values accepted are 0-180, but if I put -90 it accepts and it shows on $Param_group[1].$mount_angle the -90 but problem still happens so I'm not sure if it's doing anything.

    I really do not understand very well how this works since in theory if robot was mounted to the wall with the front part pointing to left or right instead of up/down from the floor, gravity forces would be different and with that configuration will not be taken into account... is there any more thing or config I should change other than this?

    Thanks in advance.

    Display More

    Hello, did you fill in the payload correctly?

  • Shellmer
    Reactions Received
    52
    Trophies
    5
    Posts
    161
    • June 20, 2023 at 5:49 PM
    • #3

    Yeah, it's ok, payload data are theoric values since as it is that low and close to the flange Fanuc is not able to calculate the inertias itself. I even checked the active payload when on T1 to ensure the correct one was selected and it's correct, this happens wathever payload I select on program or executing manually the payload select instruction... it's not a problem while moving the robot, only when I press the deadman and motors turn on/brakes release. Robot doesn't give any collision or disturbance excess while working in automatic.

    Tool+piece is about 1.3kg. This never happened me before on other robots that are also wall mounted, but that robots are a different and bigger model.

  • Bout_de_ficelle
    Reactions Received
    14
    Trophies
    1
    Posts
    52
    • June 20, 2023 at 5:58 PM
    • #4
    Quote from Shellmer

    Yeah, it's ok, payload data are theoric values since as it is that low and close to the flange Fanuc is not able to calculate the inertias itself. I even checked the active payload when on T1 to ensure the correct one was selected and it's correct, this happens wathever payload I select on program or executing manually the payload select instruction... it's not a problem while moving the robot, only when I press the deadman and motors turn on/brakes release. Robot doesn't give any collision or disturbance excess while working in automatic.

    Tool+piece is about 1.3kg. This never happened me before on other robots that are also wall mounted, but that robots are a different and bigger model.

    I have a LrMate 200iD/7L and it gives me a coup quadnn the brakes debloc fanuc saw the robots do it he mont said it was because of the extended arm. It could also be due to the robot not being fixed properly.

  • Doctor_C
    Reactions Received
    33
    Trophies
    4
    Posts
    198
    • June 22, 2023 at 3:05 PM
    • #5

    Yes, your angle mount should be -90. I would use the AP1 and reload the robot and start from the beginning. I have seen in the past where changing the mount angle later did not work.

  • ROBOT_G
    Reactions Received
    23
    Trophies
    4
    Posts
    241
    • June 22, 2023 at 7:31 PM
    • #6

    Your world coordinate system will move with the mount angle. You can check it that way.

  • Shellmer
    Reactions Received
    52
    Trophies
    5
    Posts
    161
    • June 26, 2023 at 10:52 AM
    • #7
    Quote from ROBOT_G

    Your world coordinate system will move with the mount angle. You can check it that way.

    I didn't notice that after doing the change on the real robot, it still moves the same way when on world and I do not needed to do any changes on the motions that used uframe 0.

    Are you sure of this? As far as I know world coords stay the same, and if you require to jog correctly you must use a JogFrame with the rotated value to align with the floor...

    Quote from Doctor_C

    Yes, your angle mount should be -90. I would use the AP1 and reload the robot and start from the beginning. I have seen in the past where changing the mount angle later did not work.

    What do you mean with AP1? Loading the original robot image and do it from scratch?

    And yeah, I had problems with another robots where other people have loaded some files from other robots, even with the same controller model and firmware version... seems fanuc doesn't like that. Maybe that is the root issue of this behaviour since on the past I had to restore the original image on two robots and do the config from scratch because robot was giving collisions mid air due to the collision guard monitoring having the wrong values.

    Thanks for confirming the value must be -90, that was what I was thinking but the mechanical unit manual is not very clear about that.

    Thanks.

    Edited once, last by Shellmer (June 26, 2023 at 10:58 AM).

  • Doctor_C
    Reactions Received
    33
    Trophies
    4
    Posts
    198
    • June 26, 2023 at 7:04 PM
    • #8

    Sorry the AP1 is the original card from Fanuc that comes with the robot. Has the loadable files.

  • Doctor_C
    Reactions Received
    33
    Trophies
    4
    Posts
    198
    • June 28, 2023 at 1:10 PM
    • #9

    Shellmer,

    You may want to contact Fanuc. My partner told me that Fanuc told him you can't have negative angles

  • Shellmer
    Reactions Received
    52
    Trophies
    5
    Posts
    161
    • June 29, 2023 at 10:24 AM
    • #10
    Quote from Doctor_C

    Shellmer,

    You may want to contact Fanuc. My partner told me that Fanuc told him you can't have negative angles

    Thank you, I will ask the customer if the AP1 came with the robot, but as far as I know, here fanuc doesn't provide any additional card when robot is received, only the documentation regarding the calibration data and the approval info. We use to do a image first time before performing any change on configs or files and that is all we have.

    I will ask fanuc then, since the way the robot is working doesn't allow to flip the base 180° in order to put the mount angle like on the mechanical unit manual to keep the angle positive... there must be a way to indicate that robot is mounted that way since effort on the axis should be pretty the same if it takes into account gravity the other way... that robot doesn't have any compensator for the axis 2, so maybe that is the issue and it should be mounted flipped 180°...

  • PnsStarter
    Reactions Received
    94
    Trophies
    6
    Posts
    336
    • June 29, 2023 at 11:38 AM
    • #11

    I had a couple of projects and I believe $MOUNTANGLE is allowed to be positive and negative.

    Is the robot really rotated arount the Y-Axis(World) of the robot?

    Quote from Shellmer

    ... that robot doesn't have any compensator for the axis 2

    Do you mean Axis3? --> I had Problems with a "heavy" welding equipment at Axis3. And yes, there was not compensation for that. Maybe at newer controllers?!

    Backdate/TP-Tools: A small collection of tools that simplify the commissioning and programming of Fanuc robots. (github.com)

  • Shellmer
    Reactions Received
    52
    Trophies
    5
    Posts
    161
    • June 29, 2023 at 1:31 PM
    • #12

    Robot with all axis at 0 is pointing to the ceiling, connectors from the base are pointing to the floor.

    So yeah, Y axis if you see it from baseframe is rotated 90 degrees to the floor.

    X is pointing to the ceiling, Y to a lateral of the wall and Z is perpendicular to the wall (I will try to attach a sketch later)

    Robot carries a very low weight, there is none attached to the axis 3 since all what's needed passes through the user signal connectors and the internal pneumatics. Also the armload from axis 1 and 3 is at 0 since there is none attached...

    Setup done from controlled start allows both 90 and -90 values, even as it states that values go from 0-180 if you introduce -90 it accepts it and the system variable where the mount angle is store displays -90. I would expect that if you put an incorrect valie there it would not be acepted...

  • pdl
    Reactions Received
    270
    Trophies
    9
    Posts
    1,544
    • June 29, 2023 at 8:51 PM
    • #13

    After adjusting the mount angle during a controlled start using the "manual" maintenance setup, try running the maintenance setup in the "auto" mode.

    This has been the recommended procedure from Fanuc support, and has fixed some issues for me in the past. This is also recommended when adding an extended axis or an additional motion group.

Advertising from our partners

IRBCAM
Robotics Channel
Robotics Training
Advertise in robotics
Advertise in Robotics
Advertise in Robotics

Job Postings

  • Anyware Robotics is hiring!

    yzhou377 February 23, 2025 at 4:54 AM
  • How to see your Job Posting (search or recruit) here in Robot-Forum.com

    Werner Hampel November 18, 2021 at 3:44 PM
Your browser does not support videos RoboDK Software for simulation and programming

Tag Cloud

  • abb
  • Backup
  • calibration
  • Communication
  • CRX
  • DCS
  • dx100
  • dx200
  • error
  • Ethernet
  • Ethernet IP
  • external axis
  • Fanuc
  • help
  • hmi
  • I/O
  • irc5
  • IRVIsion
  • karel
  • kawasaki
  • KRC2
  • KRC4
  • KRC 4
  • KRL
  • KUKA
  • motoman
  • Offset
  • PLC
  • PROFINET
  • Program
  • Programming
  • RAPID
  • robodk
  • roboguide
  • robot
  • robotstudio
  • RSI
  • safety
  • Siemens
  • simulation
  • SPEED
  • staubli
  • tcp
  • TCP/IP
  • teach pendant
  • vision
  • Welding
  • workvisual
  • yaskawa
  • YRC1000

Thread Tag Cloud

  • abb
  • Backup
  • calibration
  • Communication
  • CRX
  • DCS
  • dx100
  • dx200
  • error
  • Ethernet
  • Ethernet IP
  • external axis
  • Fanuc
  • help
  • hmi
  • I/O
  • irc5
  • IRVIsion
  • karel
  • kawasaki
  • KRC2
  • KRC4
  • KRC 4
  • KRL
  • KUKA
  • motoman
  • Offset
  • PLC
  • PROFINET
  • Program
  • Programming
  • RAPID
  • robodk
  • roboguide
  • robot
  • robotstudio
  • RSI
  • safety
  • Siemens
  • simulation
  • SPEED
  • staubli
  • tcp
  • TCP/IP
  • teach pendant
  • vision
  • Welding
  • workvisual
  • yaskawa
  • YRC1000

Similar Threads

  • My Advanced Realistic Humanoid Robot Project

    • artbyrobot
    • June 27, 2022 at 4:10 AM
    • General Robotics Discussions - everything but NO Industrial Robots
  • Calibration of track changed robot axes

    • Vlad222
    • December 22, 2022 at 11:12 AM
    • KUKA Robot Forum
  • What is a "Chain 1 Fault +24 Volt" Error

    • katkat
    • March 9, 2016 at 8:04 PM
    • Fanuc Robot Forum
  • Mount Angle

    • beanluke
    • November 9, 2017 at 9:55 PM
    • Fanuc Robot Forum
  • Lrmate 200id-7L Robot Axis 2/3 issue

    • kevilay2017
    • January 2, 2017 at 9:24 PM
    • Fanuc Robot Forum
  • ABC to rotation angles- vertical horizontal movements

    • Radek
    • February 19, 2020 at 12:14 PM
    • KUKA Robot Forum
  • KUKA KR8 gravity compensation

    • Vlad222
    • November 19, 2019 at 11:27 AM
    • KUKA Robot Forum
  • Milling in Aluminium, wich robot?

    • AluMill
    • October 27, 2019 at 5:07 PM
    • KUKA Robot Forum
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Legal Notice
Powered by WoltLab Suite™
As a registered Member:
* You will see no Google advertising
* You can translate posts into your local language
* You can ask questions or help the community with your knowledge
* You can thank the authors for their help
* You can receive notifications of replies or new topics on request
* We do not sell your data - we promise

JOIN OUR GREAT ROBOTICS COMMUNITY.
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
Register Yourself Lost Password
Robotforum - Support and discussion community for industrial robots and cobots in the WSC-Connect App on Google Play
Robotforum - Support and discussion community for industrial robots and cobots in the WSC-Connect App on the App Store
Download