Can you post a picture of your current master counts from the tp screen? They are under dmr_grp in the system variables.
did not quite understand what you need, photo ...
fanuc r 2000ib 210f offset 4 axis
-
mekeale -
April 11, 2022 at 8:54 AM -
Thread is Unresolved
-
If you dig one step deeper into the master counts, we could see if they match the sheet you posted earlier. At this point I still think you need to remaster anyways.
Your last post is worrisome. Do you have the handling tool manual?
-
I'll make this a very specific question:
What Fanuc manuals do you have?
-
I'll make this a very specific question:
What Fanuc manuals do you have?
Here's what I have.
-
Any of those mechanical unit manuals will have a complete section dedicated to each type of mastering.
RTFM
-
Any of those mechanical unit manuals will have a complete section dedicated to each type of mastering.
RTFM
I'm still busy. When I have time, I'll use your instructions first. I'll post the results.
-
Did you reteach your TCP afterwards?
How did you teach it?
-
Seems that the movement goes through singularity. Try a different movement, is the deviation the same?
-
Вы переучивали свой TCP после этого?
Как вы этому научили?
Yes, I taught, 6 points.
-
Seems that the movement goes through singularity. Try a different movement, is the deviation the same?
I'll try, but immediately after the calibration, I checked and filmed what happened. trained the tool in another place and rotated the 4th axis around Z, the offset is the same.
-
may affect incorrect PAYLOAD?
Having very accurate payload and inertia values should help your robot's accuracy and repeatability. Would you try teaching a 4-point TCP and tell us what mean and max errors you are getting?
-
Having very accurate payload and inertia values should help your robot's accuracy and repeatability. Would you try teaching a 4-point TCP and tell us what mean and max errors you are getting?
Is 4 points training more accurate than 6? Tomorrow I will re-master the payload and calibrate according to the above instructions, followed by 4-point training.
-
Is 4 points training more accurate than 6? Tomorrow I will re-master the payload and calibrate according to the above instructions, followed by 4-point training.
My understanding was that the 6-point tool teaching is only as accurate as a 3-point tool teaching, but provides the added benefit of teaching orientations, not just an offset. 4 point teach method is technically just a 3 point teach that picks the closest 3 points to generate an offset and informs you how far out the worst, unused 4th point was from the others.
Somebody chime in if I am incorrect.
-
I thought 4 point just shifted the origin. May need to double check the manual.
-
I believe you guys have your Endians crossed.
Erik is referring to teaching tool frames.
HawkME is referring to teaching user frames.
HawkME, I too did not know about this new method until I learned about it from Erik. It's in the HandlingTool manual, section 6.6.2.3.
-
I believe you guys have your Endians crossed.
Erik is referring to teaching tool frames.
HawkME is referring to teaching user frames.
HawkME, I too did not know about this new method until I learned about it from Erik. It's in the HandlingTool manual, section 6.6.2.3.
what is the name of section 6.6.2.3.?
Thank you
Advertising from our partners
