1. Home
    1. Dashboard
    2. Search
  2. Forum
    1. Unresolved Threads
    2. Members
      1. Recent Activities
      2. Users Online
      3. Team Members
      4. Search Members
      5. Trophys
  3. Articles
  4. Blog
  5. Videos
  6. Jobs
  7. Shop
    1. Orders
  • Login or register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • Blog Articles
  • Products
  • More Options
  1. Robotforum - Support and discussion community for industrial robots and cobots
  2. Forum
  3. Industrial Robot Support and Discussion Center
  4. Fanuc Robot Forum
Your browser does not support videos RoboDK Software for simulation and programming
Visit our Mainsponsor
IRBCAM
Robotics Channel
Robotics Training
Advertise in robotics
Sponsored Ads

Payload/Collision Guard

  • K-Sky
  • September 9, 2016 at 8:10 PM
  • Thread is Resolved
  • K-Sky
    Reactions Received
    4
    Trophies
    3
    Posts
    196
    • September 9, 2016 at 8:10 PM
    • #1

    I am currently dry running a new robot setup at 100% and I have a few concerns as I'm getting Disturbance Excess alarms. I know I do not have accurate payload info, I have worked with the design guys and we even have calculators from our corporate office that is supposed to take the Solidworks model and output payload info, but the numbers never seem accurate or are obviously way off. I have a few questions:

    1. I have ran Fanuc's built in auto-detect payload program and it never matches the payload values given to me by the design guys. Does anyone use the auto-detect and if so, does it match known good values?
    2. Does anyone know of any easier ways to calculate the payload, the formulas in Fanuc's manual are a little hard to follow.
    3. Are you using multiple payloads, i.e. payload#1 for carrying raw parts and then switch to payload#2 when carrying finished parts and so on? In my experience I have seen few programs like this, so I usually just set 1 payload while gripping raw and finished parts(worst case scenario) and I figured that was good, or is this some of my problem? I always figured it was better for the robot to expect more weight than actual, than to be surprised by extra weight?
    4. Is there a general consensus on when to adjust the collision guard and how high to do you adjust, or is this always done by "feel"? I basically default to 100% and then when im going to pick or drop parts, anywhere Im anticipating a collision, I go up to 125-150%. Is that not ideal?
    5. Normally I initially program a cell with no move at more than 50% of max possible speed and then ramp as needed by customer. In this cell the cycle time is quite critical so I have a lot of moves at 100% which im sure is making the robot more susceptible to errors due to my incorrect payload. Do most people start low and increase as I normally do or just leave the speed at 100% from the start unless there is an issue then slow down where needed?
    Thanks in advance for any help.

  • Racermike123
    Reactions Received
    14
    Trophies
    4
    Posts
    901
    • September 9, 2016 at 8:40 PM
    • #2

    1. I have used auto payload and it worked fine. I see what you mean though the values don't look right!
    2. No! I have had to weigh the tooling and guess on where the center of gravity if I don't have payload info.
    3. I use multiple pay loads when possible. It makes Collision Guard work better.
    4. I increase the sensitivity when picking and placing parts because that is when I am most concerned about crashes and damaging equipment. I run at 100% sensitivity when moving outside of critical areas. Or when the robot is moving in between flip and non flip configurations.
    5. Most of my robots run at 100%. I slow them down when running heavy parts.

  • Iowan
    Reactions Received
    2
    Trophies
    4
    Posts
    686
    • September 9, 2016 at 8:41 PM
    • #3

    I have a couple of routers that occasionally get the Disturbance Excess alarms. It is not repeatable, so I'm never sure when/if it will occur. It doesn't fault the machine, so I generally just live with it. A higher collision threshold will probably save some false trips, but means a harder hit if a collision DOES occur. Some of our machines have a shock sensor that is set finer than the robot, but sometimes they cause more problems than they solve.

  • K-Sky
    Reactions Received
    4
    Trophies
    3
    Posts
    196
    • September 9, 2016 at 9:14 PM
    • #4
    Quote from Racermike123


    4. I increase the sensitivity when picking and placing parts because that is when I am most concerned about crashes and damaging equipment. I run at 100% sensitivity when moving outside of critical areas. Or when the robot is moving in between flip and non flip configurations.

    How high of an increase do you go-150% or even higher? I don't have that much formal training, but looking at past jobs by our company or even setups by other companies I cant recall ever seeing anyone use over 150% before. Is there a reason to not just go straight to 200% in a critical area?

    Quote from Iowan


    I have a couple of routers that occasionally get the Disturbance Excess alarms. It is not repeatable, so I'm never sure when/if it will occur. It doesn't fault the machine, so I generally just live with it. A higher collision threshold will probably save some false trips, but means a harder hit if a collision DOES occur. Some of our machines have a shock sensor that is set finer than the robot, but sometimes they cause more problems than they solve.

    I really do not want to deliver a brand new robot with Disturbance Excess alarms, if I can help it. The alarms aren't 100% repeatable as you mentioned, but I am narrowing them down to when and where they somethimes happen and adjusting the collision guard until they don't show up again in that area. A lot of trial and error so far.

  • Racermike123
    Reactions Received
    14
    Trophies
    4
    Posts
    901
    • September 9, 2016 at 10:09 PM
    • #5

    Each application is different. They are all between 150 and 175%. My goal is to not scrap parts.
    On one robot we have an inspection station that is glass. I have that robot at 175% when unloading.
    I start at 200% and if it start faulting I start lowering it until it runs without faulting.

Advertising from our partners

IRBCAM
Robotics Channel
Robotics Training
Advertise in robotics
Advertise in Robotics
Advertise in Robotics

Job Postings

  • Anyware Robotics is hiring!

    yzhou377 February 23, 2025 at 4:54 AM
  • How to see your Job Posting (search or recruit) here in Robot-Forum.com

    Werner Hampel November 18, 2021 at 3:44 PM
Your browser does not support videos RoboDK Software for simulation and programming

Tag Cloud

  • abb
  • Backup
  • calibration
  • Communication
  • CRX
  • DCS
  • dx100
  • dx200
  • error
  • Ethernet
  • Ethernet IP
  • external axis
  • Fanuc
  • help
  • hmi
  • I/O
  • irc5
  • IRVIsion
  • karel
  • kawasaki
  • KRC2
  • KRC4
  • KRC 4
  • krc5
  • KRL
  • KUKA
  • motoman
  • Offset
  • PLC
  • PROFINET
  • Program
  • Programming
  • RAPID
  • roboguide
  • robot
  • robotstudio
  • RSI
  • safety
  • Siemens
  • simulation
  • SPEED
  • staubli
  • tcp
  • TCP/IP
  • teach pendant
  • vision
  • Welding
  • workvisual
  • yaskawa
  • YRC1000

Thread Tag Cloud

  • abb
  • Backup
  • calibration
  • Communication
  • CRX
  • DCS
  • dx100
  • dx200
  • error
  • Ethernet
  • Ethernet IP
  • external axis
  • Fanuc
  • help
  • hmi
  • I/O
  • irc5
  • IRVIsion
  • karel
  • kawasaki
  • KRC2
  • KRC4
  • KRC 4
  • krc5
  • KRL
  • KUKA
  • motoman
  • Offset
  • PLC
  • PROFINET
  • Program
  • Programming
  • RAPID
  • roboguide
  • robot
  • robotstudio
  • RSI
  • safety
  • Siemens
  • simulation
  • SPEED
  • staubli
  • tcp
  • TCP/IP
  • teach pendant
  • vision
  • Welding
  • workvisual
  • yaskawa
  • YRC1000
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Legal Notice
Powered by WoltLab Suite™
As a registered Member:
* You will see no Google advertising
* You can translate posts into your local language
* You can ask questions or help the community with your knowledge
* You can thank the authors for their help
* You can receive notifications of replies or new topics on request
* We do not sell your data - we promise

JOIN OUR GREAT ROBOTICS COMMUNITY.
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
Register Yourself Lost Password
Robotforum - Support and discussion community for industrial robots and cobots in the WSC-Connect App on Google Play
Robotforum - Support and discussion community for industrial robots and cobots in the WSC-Connect App on the App Store
Download