Anyone here running Ros on Windows operating system?
Ros2 particularly.
Tia
Anyone here running Ros on Windows operating system?
Ros2 particularly.
Tia
We are trying to use pure dpm instructions in Karen to do orientation movement. The problem is that the rotations we send out don’t accumulate to the actual rotation we get. There can be 5-15 degrees offset. The xyz movement however is very accurate up to 0.1mm.
Any help would be appreciated
We have found that after apply Fanuc gravity compensation, the TCP calibration error increased: we can visually see that the tip deviate more when we change the tool pose. We use the flange pose to calculate the TCP position ourself and got very close answers.
So the question: does anyone else see that the gravity compensation decrease the TCP consistency?
After switch to gravity compensation, do we need to redo zero position. We currently just used the zero position mastering from the factory. The robot is M10-ID12
According to the document that came with the robot, zero position calibration was done with gravity compensation on.
TIA
It seems that the fanuc gravity compensation only works at the upper level of kinematics. Not altering the axel data.
But still I'd like to know why the 2 and 3 encoder count has a such a large ratio.
Any help would be appreciated. And we did check the data several times.
TIA
I have some questions about fanuc spc count. We have extracted some data from a fanuc LR mate200iD/7lc robot. The fields we got are SYSTEM*$DMR_GRP[1].$SPC_COUNT[1-6].
1. Why do the spc count 5 and 6 have a wield ratio? basically spc6 = spc5*0.0099..+c.
2. seems that only axle 3 and 6 are linear combinations of spc counts. Others are pure linear scalings of one spc count values. Is this correct?
2. It seems that the gravity compensation does not impact any of these ralations. Which is wield. It makes me doubt if the gravity compensation actually works. Any insight in this?
TIA