Posts by ericwiz7923
-
-
-
controller pics
-
-
6 axis, 300KG payload Capability, 2501mm reach. Will be sold with D Controller, 1JF board (ethernet), 2 (Discrete IO)1JR boards, Teach Pendant. It will not come with the wiring harness that connects the robot to the controller. We can subtract the cost of a new harness from the final cost. Hour Meter reads 60,537. You may verify this by searching “HOUR_MTR” in the backup called “Zx300Final”.
-
Does anyone have info on Robotic Braizing? How does it work? Is it all timing based or is there a weld controller like in Mig and Sport welding? Gaseous versus Induction? Are there any integrators that specialize in this? Any info would be great.
-
I’m sorry but we sold the unit. Any interest in a ZX300s with a D controller please msg me.
-
I’ll provide a much more detailed response later tonight as I am currently in the midst of the third training. Today has shown even more improvement. Thanks again for the constructive advice.
-
You are right. Actually I need documents about Kawasaki communication.
Note: I already received AS language manuel.
this might help
-
kwakisaki another great answer sir.
Regarding the specific IO situation:
- Have a peripheral so that they can install, configure, commission and test it from scratch using an IO box with switches and leds or a fieldbus IO device.
- Then program the robot to integrate it into a working solution.
- Then introduce them to how it is being integrated in the 'working system' by providing a code walkthrough.
- Including the areas that they have already just used, so they can see the comparison.
P.S
Have a look on Google for 'Domain of Learning' - Cognitive, Affective, Psychomotor.........A very interesting read indeed if you take training seriously.
I've attached two of my IO sheets I've created that I am using for training. The one called ISW-01A is probably more user friendly to understand. The difficulties to understand IWS-02B probably come from the fact that originally the cell was configured for another application so there is a bunch "leftovers" in the program and the IO configuration. The biggest problems seem to be coming from the UOP signals and program calling. Ill be running my head at the wall today to continue to tweak the lesson today. My second training went well yesterday. This was with my most experienced technician though and he agreed that there was still some being lost in translation.
I downloaded your word doc, and noticed no comments on any lines? That may help in understanding each line.
A very good point. Thank you.
-
Hello everyone,
I came for topic that E series Manuels,
I need E series manuels, Could anyone send me ?
There is three of the main ones already posted. If E-Ops, As Language, and External IO don't cover it then you will need to be more specific.
-
For the next two weeks I'm cycling through my EMT's (Electrical Maintenance Technicians) and taking them to a local community college for a one day hands on training to help them gain familiarity with Fanuc Robots. They have all had formal operations/handling training from Kawasaki ( we have more Kawasaki Robots then Fanuc) so some concepts transfer over well. I performed my first training day yesterday and I felt it went fairly smoothly. I got the bare bones basics across (terminology, basic components of TP and Controller, TP layout, Joint/World/Tool Jogging, IO Types/IO Uses/IO configurations) done in the first four hours then spent the last 4 hours making a simple program and then continuously modifying it to give them more experience. All in all my tech felt like they learned some useful information and I felt like I cover the content competently. The only section I feel I need to tweak is the content pertaining to IO types, IO Uses, and IO configuration. So I guess that is my question for you all, when training how do you all cover that info without losing yours pupils attention or confusing them? The equipment we were using to train on was a certified Fanuc Education Training cell which uses local IO all configured to Rack 48 ( I think?), this was the first time I had ever actually worked with that particular style of configuration so I believe this was part of my problem, I understood it well enough to work with it but not teach it. Generally I'm used to a ethernet configuration although we do have two Fanuc Robots with Model B type IO. I brought along data sheets I had made showing the interconnected DI's/DO's and their correlating PLC tags/bits. And when I tried to explain program calls (PNS/RSR/Other) and I felt like I really lost him then). For information's sake we use RSR and Other type program calls. I attached a image of the training cell and a transcript of the program my tech created by the end of the day (we couldn't make a backup because the cell used CF cards only which I had none with me). I'm just throwing this out there to see if anyone with experience providing technical training can help guide a another relatively new "Trainer".
-
I am looking for E series controler AS language manual.
Thanks in advance
cheers!!
here ya go
-
Unfortunately it’s a temporary arrangement, once we get the correct connectors for the 1TW board we will revert back to it. Then I’ll throw the 1UR board back in the old controller and sell it with it. We are going through upgrading and homogenizing out equipment so after some upgrades all of our robots will have a 1TW board, we can reduce parts inventory that way. If any one wants a RD80N with a EController and a 1UR board let me know. I also have it posted in the forum Market place.
-
It was 100% the issue, once we got the option enabled we began receiving our discrete IO signals. Thanks again for the help.
-
Here is the final backup from the robot we were replacing.
-
here is a current back up of the new robot.
-
Also when using the AS command ioboard_status this is the result. Everything on the teach pendant appears enabled to us though.
-
We do have a manual for the 1UR board but it hasn't been much help
-
We are in the process of replacing a RD80N with a brand new RS050N. Both were e-controllers. Unfortunately there was a mix up when specing the IO and instead of a 1UR board in the new controller we received a 1TW board. Our physical IO connections do not allow for the connection to the 1TW board, only for the 1UR board so we decided to re-use the original 1UR board. Now we have no errors on the pendant, but when are not seeing any inputs made when they should be and are not receiving 24v to our outputs. Our integrator traced the lack or 24v to our 1UR board. Does anyone have a suggestion on how to troubleshoot this further or a suggestion on how to the remedy the situation?