Oh thank god, its not just me.
I have been strugling with this for DAYS now.
The Profinet(m) menu item is shown, but it does nothing.
Apparently there should be a piece of software called pfn-ct that can do the setup from a pc, if you are connected to the profinet side.
Im still trying to get a hold on this software, Not to mention a newer version of the profibus manual that contains appendix D, that shows more about the molex cards.
yes... WoV is big and buggy... it crashes a lot... which frustrates me as well.
any yet, somehow we all keep on performing miracles.
what is dnVW and what logs you are talking about?
and why is it impressive that someone chose base 10 to do something when base 10 is what everyone learns since childhood? sure one could choose to change this to 9 or 17 if one needed but unless there is a very specific reason for that - why bother?
btw. i am speaking from experience. i was making multithreading applications that did tons of things in real time. and once you push things to the extremes everything needs attention to detail. then logging is no longer just a matter of opening file, appending line and closing the file. choosing how to handle volumes of data becomes an issue. working with smaller files is faster so splitting things can make sense. and using ring buffer to write one of N files is not unheard of. and making N value change dynamically would make things more complex and slower.
Ahh sorry. Miswritten. Dnwv. Does not work visual. It's a childish coping mechanism for the frustrations of working with something that just keeps crashing. I'm not necessarily impressed with the number 10. I'm impressed that one feature of that software actually works.
Things that doesn't work would include things like creating shortcuts, having internal shortcuts mapped to multiple things, crashing the syntax checker, chrashing on going online, chrashing just because its Tuesday (or the wind turns, or god knows why) ,not being able To change some inline formulas. And that's just the ones I remember from the too of my head.
Being able to create a workable robot program in this is nothing short of a miracle
I think that is because of the ring buffer cycle configured.
They do it often to avoid filling disk with error reports.
Normally such ring buffers numbers can be changed based on user needs.
KUKA should be the best place to get further info.
Possibly. Or to camouflage that dnVW chrashes about 25 times a day, if you actually use it to go online.
I'm impressed that it's possible to make a stable robot program working with it.
Am i the only one thats impressed by the way work visual always manages to keep exactly 10 log files stored ?
Never 11, always 10.
THAT part of dnWV works every time.
Collision detection in most robots really sucks.
That they can't actually predict the amount of force needed for a movement, well being used to abb's i will never understand this.
My normal use cases was products with different sizes and densities, even where they were to be picked in the tool.
So adding this to the tool load, and letting the ABB run with standard coldetect settings, nothing bad would ever happen in case the product sucked.
It also wasn't unusual to have something like 3000 different permutations, but only have the heaviest, longest/ shortest 4-5 types when testing.
So the solution, like panic suggests, More sensors, and make sure no collision occurs, because actually setting up collision detection needs a very locked program/payload/speed structure.
This kind of negates the very usefull ability of robots to adapt to new products, but there you go
I was just recently out to help an older Kuka.
Specifically it was a KR120r3200 /KRC4 running kss 8.2.20
None of the versions of work visual i could get my fingers on, was able to open the project.
I tried with 4.** , told me it was too new, and that it didnt want to speak to such an old robot
Then i tried with WorkVisual_V2.4.5_Build0091 and WorkVisual_V2.4.6_Build0098
These would open the project, but
Neither the project on the robot, nor the ones we had in our backup archive.
They all kept complaining about a dtm error.
I think i tracked it to the KUKA-DEV io item
I then, in desperation tried to recreate the project from scratch, only to find that
None of these old versions supported the KR120/R3200 Robot.
They would support other KR120's but the R3200 wasn't there yet.
Does anyone have any experience regarding what version of Workvisual would support 8.2.20 ?
@Danny.
I can give you an example of where you want the robot to NOT go back.
I have a robot cell. This cell will be moved from our site, to the customers site.
Once there, someone will have to recalibrate the bases.
The way i do this, is i have a laser sensor on the robot, that must hit some marks.
Then i calculate the offsets, and everything just works.
The guy that has to align the marks with the laser, is the mechanical supervisor.
I can teach him, how to jog the robot a little, but not how to do this, the real way.
Instead i create an install wizard, that moves the robot to just about the correct position. Then asks the supervisor to adjust the position. Then i do an Thispos=$pos_act, moves to the next position and so on.
Since i sometimes have a year, from when were done with the robot, till the robot is on site, this also helps me.
Hi. does anyone have a manual for the aristorob 500 ?
Im trying to mate it to an S2, and im getting lost in the wiring
I did quite a few 5.25" to 3.5" conversions, I am UK based and the only source of the correct 3.5" drives at the time was in the US so we had to import them.
Can you remember what you had to change configuring the Teac FD235HF? Im asking as im trying to revive an old S2 and an s3 system as well
Well, there is actually a really UGLY way of doing this.
1) Get an router, it doesn't matter if its has wifi or not, configure as follows.
a) No DHCP server
b) Wan setting, DHCP
c) Local IP, as needed by your network
2) Configure a routing table either on the dhcp server of your company lan, or in your computer routing table
a) something like "robot1" = Router 1 ip and "robot2" = Router 2 ip
its not pretty, but i have gotten it working a couple of times.
Best solution, get the pc option
