Forge/os is a new programming environment, you can program every robot brand with the same "programming language/environment". See ready-robotics.com.
They do not provide any tool for offline editing! so seems that the only way is by means of the Forge TP.
and what is the file format? text or binary? did you take a peek with some text editor?
Yes, I did, it's *.task, and when opened it's text, but there's certain codification so some text is legible, some not.
What robot brand is this for?
It's a Motoman GP50.
Hi all,
I need to edit a Forge/OS job (*.task) in a PC. Is there any software to do this? Or at least a way of opening them to read and understand the code?
Thank you all!
Log in at https://software.yaskawa.eu.com
Search for MOTOSim EG-VRC and press details instead of download. There you have the older versions available.
Because I've tried several times to open an account but the company is not returning my comfirmation email. Weird. Thanks anyway!!!
Memory on all controllers is backed up by a battery, including YRC. Battery dies and capacitor discharges programs go away.
Thanks for that, but I thought memory on the CF card inside the CPU could retain memory for ever, pretty much like a usb drive.
Hi all!,
Is this controller program area memory backed up by batteries? or is it a long lasting EPROM/ROM memory type so programs won't ever get lost?
Thanks in advance.
Why don't want to use new version (2022)?
Because I'm a licenced user and my hardkey covers until 2019 only.
In the US there was 2021 and 2021 SP1.
I read around there that there's even a SP3 release. The problem is that the official site has 2022 as the only choice for downloading.
Hi everyone,
I need to reinstall Motosim and I would like to have a newer version than 2018, but not 2022. I don't know the release history, but is there any newer version released after 2018 that isn't actually 2022?
Thanks in advance!
hello. I had a lot of problems with the 2018 version. I think the windows version matters, but that's just my opinion. Anyway, since I changed the computer and switched to motosim 2020, I haven't had the slightest problem. All the best. .
Thanks mihaita, I'm looking forward to buy this version. I had the updates for free in the past from the company, but they aren't anymore. Btw, I have windows 7 Pro, do you think upgrading to W8 or W10 could improve performance? Thanks.
Hi All!
I have this problem in a Motosim 2018 Cell. Two robots in coordinated motion. When inserting a SFTON command (XXXX SFTON RB1 P000), and when in edition mode, moving the cursor form SFTON to RB1 with arrows, form left to right, the program crashes. Any insights?
Thanks in advance!
You may be in cylindrical as apposed to rectangular.
Go to setup/teaching conditions to change.
Robodoc, As 95devils noticed, perhaps it's because the robots are forced to move in the standard WP position in the Y direction, but instead of going in excesive segment error, it moves like this, similar to S joint movement but keeping track of x and z in zero coordinates.
Display MoreWhat robot models?
Where is the Work Home Position?
Is the robot in singularity?
What Cartesian mode are you jogging in?
GP180, WP is in the standard WP, For the coordinate I'm willing to move, it is!! But it does not show the alarm of excessive segment for that move, so instead of resolving the issue, it goes this way! may it be a bug of the program for this robot or controller? Or some setup configuration that leads to this behaviour?
I'm jogging it in precisely Cartesian mode. No Cylindrical, Rectangular.
Hi all,
I need help in Motosim,
There's this coordinated motion cell arranged with two robots in a jigless synchronized movement. Both robots calibration position is flange to flange in contact, with robots in WORK HOME position posture, one facing the other. By some reason I can't figure out why, when moving the robot in cartesian mode, the TCP moves correctly in a straight line along the y axis but the posture of the flange rotates as if an S joint move was performed.
In other words, TCP should remaing irrotational around the 3 axes, but it rotates, when moving along y, the TCP rotates around z like keeping the x axis always pointing the robot zero position, intersecting z axis. But once you move the flange from the z zero position, the behaviour is normal.
Does anyone have had this problem?
Thanks.
What jumps out at me is two separate controllers happening at the same time on the same network.
Are you using a managed switch? Overload on the network with packets could cause alarms like this.
Thanks 95Devils , that was just the case. In fact, when doing a counterproof, after inserting the cable all switch lights started blinking really fast. Two sets of robot, HMI, PLC and Phoenix Contact SFN 5TX switch (forming two individual networks per cell) are connected to a mortal tplink switch in an upper network. After disconnecting each of them from this switch, the alarms went off. Dispite that, this arrangement worked fine in the past. I guess that the server upstream of the last switch was diconnected or something happened.
No managed switch. The robots were out of order for more than a year, so this happened when starting them again for doing some upgrades.
Hi everybody.
I have this set of alarms appearing at the same time on two DX200s. Please see picture attached.
Also sometimes appears this TP communication error with this other particular screen stating that a P. means cable problem, other codes mean problem with the board....
The robot is in a really dirty environment, with lots of iron deburring dust, a foundry area.
What is funny is that is appearing on two identical robots at the same time, may have is something to do with system date?
They are connected to the same LAN network.
Any help is really appreciated!
PS, I have not replaced boards of CF cards yet, but interchanged TP cables with the same result.
Thanks!!
Excellent, I'm facing an integration with it and it's awful to hear that help desk is not working when you need it, Thanks!
Hello,
In documentation is about arc_spot that is a optional function and i dont know if you must buy it from Comau directly..
I don't have smartarc anymore because we make onw app for comau robots for welding so i cant make some tests..
when you try it do you get some error message?
Hi Vladarius, thanks for replying.
Yes, that the option is disabled, but the routine can be declared with no issues. The problem is when calling the instruction. Did you mean you can make some tests? or it was written right.
I'm in need of implementing Touch sensing, and arc spot, but Comau guys go really slow. I'm still waiting for answers.
I'm also expanding the tools for welding additional parts, and I'll try to do a 2 axis dual station for positioning parts to the robot.
Of course, I guess, it's impossible to do it in a coordinated way, so with a simple multi position solution I'll be happy. I must say that I remember
your application posted some time ago, Perhaps I ask you for some help,
Regards,
