Bacground Logic

I believe it's practically the same thing, the only difference is that by doing it in just one logic, you will have more space, if you want to add other BACKGROUND Logic.

Hi mey_88,

There is no real good or bad here.
From my point of view, it has proven to be a good idea to create the BG progs in this way, for example:

BG_IO.tp - generic IO and IO to reg and vice versa
BG_Gripper1.tp - application-dependent and topic-dependent

for testing use separated prog, and copy it later to another..

Quote from PnsStarter

From my point of view, it has proven to be a good idea to create the BG progs in this way, for example:

BG_IO.tp - generic IO and IO to reg and vice versa
BG_Gripper1.tp - application-dependent and topic-dependent

for testing use separated prog, and copy it later to another..

I agree. Also you can assign the execution mode to a separate program in that case. I don't notice much difference in my applications but high mode provides you to execute up to 540 instructions every 8 ms. Perhaps it would be useful to divide Background logic programs by priorities