Programming manual?
KRL references?
Where is it that you see the command?
Are you sure it's not Tool[1] ; outile de soudure
Anything after a semi-colon is treated as a remark.
The tool names are normally irrelevant, although if the Sim is outputting full Inline Forms points, I imagine that it could create operator confusion. The TOOL_NAME variables in $CONFIG.DAT should be changed so that the name of each tool matches the tool of the same number in the Simulation setup.
sounds like what you see is a part of inline form motion instruction (PTP, LIN,...)
tool names can be edited of course, you can access it when teaching tool or by editing $config.dat:
DECL CHAR TOOL_NAME[16,24]
TOOL_NAME[1,]="Case Gripper"
TOOL_NAME[2,]="Beer Opener"
TOOL_NAME[3,]="BBQ skewer"
TOOL_NAME[4,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[5,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[6,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[7,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[8,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[9,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[10,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[11,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[12,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[13,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[14,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[15,]=" "
TOOL_NAME[16,]=" "you can make program that when executed will update home position to whatever you normally use such as
xHOME = {A1 0, A2 -90, A3 90, A4 0, A5 0, A6 0}
if position ever changes, just run program with such line to update it
You don't, really. The tool names are unimportant -- they only change how the program appears to the operator, they don't change anything about how the robot behaves. The tool number, now, that's important.
But changing the TOOL_NAME values in $CONFIG.DAT in your OfficeLite should fix this discrepancy, either way. As for SimPro, I've never used it, so I can't speak to whatever issues it might have.
I would also teach base... (your screenshot shows base[0] which is nullframe or World).
by using your own base, you can quickly recover from things like moved tooling for example, no need to re-teach all points.
If you program everything in Base 0, and then the tooling or the robot are moved/altered, you will have to re-program everything from scratch. On the other hand, if you create a Base frame on every piece of tooling, and program the points for that piece of tooling with the associated Base frame, recovering your program after a hardware change becomes much easier. For example, I once had a complex program taught on a robot that later turned out to have been mounted 180deg incorrectly to the floor. Because I had set up a Base frame to the external tooling, and had taught my points in that Base, once the robot base had been moved I was able to completely recover my entire program simply be re-teaching the Base. If I had programmed everything in Base 0, I would have lost many days of work.
