June 19, 2019, 03:04:43 AM
Robotforum | Industrial Robots Community

 Robot Software Opinion

normal_post Author Topic:  Robot Software Opinion  (Read 163 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

June 10, 2019, 02:03:47 PM
Read 163 times
Offline

SteveD


Hi

I am plc systems integrator and we have integrated robots into cells to work with other hardware. A customer of ours is a machine builder has asked us to copy a simple glueing application currently using a cartesian 3 servo axis. If we price this then we know if we went servos it would be more expensive than a robot, due to the number of different variants and our engineering time.

So my question is if you had a free choice which robot manufacturer would you suggest to use and why?

I have worked with Staubli using their robot programmer and latest project was Fanuc using the customers engineer using the pendant. The programming was done by others and I would do touch-ups and set up the IO.

This would be a step for their customer as they wish to head down this route.

Cheers :beerchug:
Steve
« Last Edit: June 10, 2019, 02:34:17 PM by SteveD »

Today at 03:04:43 AM
Reply #1

Advertisement

Guest

June 10, 2019, 08:36:12 PM
Reply #1
Offline

TygerDawg


You don't mention the size needed.
For "simple gluing application" that replaces a "3 axis cartesian servo" system:

My first investigation would be Yamaha.
  • modular system design to easily configure a 3-axis system of many sizes
  • very powerful controller that uses an easily understood structured programming language
  • at one time they pushed integration with Allen-Bradley (& others?) PLCs to make RLL-driven motion commands
  • having a "robot system" (compared with custom developed servo systems) allows one to deploy faster, standardize, and improves supportability in production IMHO
  • In a previous investigation, I found that the Yamaha language can be adapted to import path point data from offline programming software or perhaps CAD software
  • If the application size is suitable, you may be able to use one of Yamaha's large SCARA arms instead of building a 3-axis unit (space and deployment-time savings)

Epson may be alternative choice for similar reasons.
TygerDawg
Blue Technik
Virtuoso Robotics Engineering
www.bluetechnik.com

June 12, 2019, 08:41:37 AM
Reply #2
Offline

SteveD


Hi TygerDawg

Thanks for the reply. The reach will be around 1700 to the furthest point with a speed of around 50-70 mm/s. The customer would eventually like to use more robots onsite, would Yamaha still be your choice or should I be looking at one of the more popular makes?

Thanks
Steve

June 12, 2019, 06:35:53 PM
Reply #3
Offline

TygerDawg


With as little as I know about your application, my answer is "yup."

Go to the Yamaha website and see what they can configure to meet the size needed.
Traverse speed would not be a problem.

I think the IAI brand may also offer something similar to Yamaha & Epson if I'm not mistaken.


Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via pinterest Share via reddit Share via twitter

clip
Crash Log Report -Second Opinion

Started by camae on KUKA Robot Forum

4 Replies
2614 Views
Last post April 24, 2013, 01:58:18 AM
by camae
xx
Expert opinion needed

Started by jibesh on KUKA Robot Forum

6 Replies
3945 Views
Last post August 06, 2014, 08:14:53 AM
by BogdanRentea
xx
Vim Users: I want your opinion on krl-for-vim and rapid-for-vim

Started by KnoP on General Discussion of Industrial Robots Only

2 Replies
1316 Views
Last post February 02, 2018, 07:21:27 PM
by KnoP
question
Newbies looking for expert opinion

Started by barely_sane on KUKA LBR IIWA

22 Replies
1593 Views
Last post November 26, 2018, 06:13:48 PM
by NullReference