Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 21, 2008, 11:25:33 PM
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: Any Problems or Experience with Industrial Robots ?
Register and place your Question to worldwide Robotexperts right here !

+  Robotforum | Support for Robotprogrammer and Users
|-+  General Category
| |-+  General Discussion (Moderator: Sven Weyer)
| | |-+  Kuka vs. OTC
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Kuka vs. OTC  (Read 312 times)
nelson4988
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« on: September 11, 2008, 05:50:32 PM »

Dears,

I will buy our first robot welder (MIG Process). I have 2 possibilities of purchase, Kuka or OTC Dahien. According to their experiences which is more realiable and low maintenance cost.
Logged
Werner Hampel
Robotprogrammer
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 160


<a href="http://www.robtec.de">ROBTEC GmbH</a>


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2008, 07:47:28 PM »

i would prefer KUKA, but if you have special Welding, i think OTC is your best choice.
Logged
jjfurgs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2008, 04:56:55 PM »

I have had the worst customer service from OTC. good luck to you. I have not used Kuka in quite a few years so I cant really compare the two.
Logged
axv6l
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2008, 08:18:29 AM »

I use kuka and otc, I think for welding application OTC is the best
Logged
jseger
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2008, 01:08:51 PM »

i use kuka controllers with igm software for welding.  i thought the igm software was horrible at first, but i see how awesome it is now that i see how the straight kuka software does it.  yikes!
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!