Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2012, 06:23:17 AM
Home Help Login Register
News: Any Problems or Experience with Industrial Robots ?
Register and place your Question / Answer to worldwide Robotexperts right here !

+  Robotforum | Support for Robotprogrammer and Users
|-+  General Category - Industrial Robot Forum
| |-+  General Discussion (Moderator: Werner Hampel)
| | |-+  Best offline programming software???
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Best offline programming software???  (Read 7417 times)
asimo
Guest
« Reply #15 on: February 29, 2008, 09:26:40 PM »

Thanks a lot for your answer TylerRobertson. As for the motion planner, do you know if it's possible to evaluate cycles time depending on the velocity and acceleration programmed in the software (imagine that I have different values in the same program)?

Thanks again!
Logged
TylerRobertson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 219

www.inhousesolutions.com


WWW
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2008, 05:56:32 PM »

hi asimo - sorry I didn't get back sooner:  motion planner is a typical to one offered in simulation only packages which slow down the programming process.  Our motion planner is less accurate but this is done to offer quicker programming.
Logged

________________________________________
Robotmaster Applications Engineering
jseger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 123



« Reply #17 on: June 12, 2008, 04:00:30 PM »


If you want to play with robot geometry and dynamics you might want to look at Scilab and the RTSS toolbox. Both are free off the web.
You can do forward and inverse kinematics and simulation, transformations, quaternion/euler conversions, matrices etc. I've only been playing with it for about 3 months now, it does seem stable, well written and surprisingly powerful. They have a Puma 560 file built. I am a cheapskate.


I just downloaded scilab and rtss toolbox.  I'd like to learn more about it.  I haven't had time to mess with it.  Is there any advice you could give a newby?  I'm a little confused on how this could work for me or how I can utilize it.  Thanks.   
Logged

Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
Jim Tyrer
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 515


Ende aller Streckenverbote


WWW
« Reply #18 on: June 16, 2008, 06:33:30 PM »

I use it for calc'ing transforms, when you one taught point and you need a series of rotational motions before and/or after that one taught point. Like when snapping plastic parts together, or you could use it for welding paths, machining etc.....
If you want do fwd and inverse kinematics then 1st step would be to sit down and write a DH definition file for whatever robot arm you are using, and test it with a real bot or simulator.
It can simulate a custom "stick robot' that you can jog around, extract coords, get cycle times etc. The list goes on.
Logged
jseger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 123



« Reply #19 on: June 19, 2008, 02:09:53 PM »

ok i'll mess around with it when i get a chance.  it messed with the robot demos in it and i haven't figured out exactly how its supposed to work.  i'll keep messing with it though.
Logged

Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
DP
Guest
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2008, 04:19:17 PM »

I've been using RobotWorks for a year now, trimming and milling operations on a Motoman ES200N. Works as a bolt-on to SolidWorks. Simple to use and cheap, but beware - you pay peanuts, you get monkey service. The software is bugged to hell and back with random crashes and oddities. After-sales support is marvellous though.
Logged
jseger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 123



« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2008, 07:17:24 PM »

Yes I've played with Robotworks before.  It has a TON of potential.  I liked it a lot.  Maybe I'll buy it someday.  I mean the company.   gibbo 
Logged

Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
DP
Guest
« Reply #22 on: July 03, 2008, 12:36:28 PM »

Yes I've played with Robotworks before.  It has a TON of potential.  I liked it a lot.  Maybe I'll buy it someday.  I mean the company.   gibbo 

Heh, I can put you in touch with Nathan, I'd love to be a fly on the wall for that conversation!

That Scilab and RTSS stuff sounds powerful, gonna download it later and have a mess! Cheers for the info.
Logged
isladelobos
Guest
« Reply #23 on: February 04, 2009, 10:21:25 PM »

Is possible the best software is robotworks.

¿This convert CAD/CAM to ARLA old language in the ABB S3 controllers?

Catia and Ros is other posibilitie, but dificult to adquire.

Robotmaster and Mastercam only work 6 axis and in some aplications need more axis.
Logged
TylerRobertson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 219

www.inhousesolutions.com


WWW
« Reply #24 on: February 06, 2009, 06:37:23 PM »

Is possible the best software is robotworks.

¿This convert CAD/CAM to ARLA old language in the ABB S3 controllers?

Catia and Ros is other posibilitie, but dificult to adquire.

Robotmaster and Mastercam only work 6 axis and in some aplications need more axis.

Robotmaster can support external linear and rotary/station axis
Logged

________________________________________
Robotmaster Applications Engineering
rdixiemiller
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 64


« Reply #25 on: February 09, 2009, 04:58:43 AM »

 I am a big fan of UltraEdit. It is cheap ($50), and has syntax files for Kawasaki, and Fanuc. You can download it and use it free for 30 days. I do mostly structured text, then POSMOD the points. I have been doing pathwork for 14 years, so I can work out the motion aspects quickly. I use UE for the code to make decisions, IO interlocks, and rack search routines. I have PC Roset (Kawasaki's off-line programming module), but have not spent the time to learn it. I am currently installing 38 FS30 arms in 3 different plants, so I am a tad busy at the moment. I imagine I will mainly use it to build my IF panel screens offline.
 For the money, I don't think you can beat UltraEdit. There are way more features than I will ever use, but I sure like the ones I do use!
 
Logged

Regards
Robert Miller
Fanuc P50, 145,155,200,ArcMate 100,120, Kawasaki FS30,MX500, old Kobelco/Kawasaki Painters
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!