Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 21, 2008, 10:53:48 PM
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: Any Problems or Experience with Industrial Robots ?
Register and place your Question to worldwide Robotexperts right here !

+  Robotforum | Support for Robotprogrammer and Users
|-+  General Category
| |-+  General Discussion (Moderator: Sven Weyer)
| | |-+  Best offline programming software???
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Best offline programming software???  (Read 2157 times)
TylerRobertson
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 26

www.inhousesolutions.com


WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 29, 2008, 07:49:15 PM »

Hi asimo - You can program two different robots, and simulate two different robots but it would have to be a mutually exclusive process, yes - you can have jobs running at the same time, but generating the programming would be one robot at a time - Motion planning is done from a CAD model - the path is selected by using the model geometry, and whatever parameters are associated with a toolpath.  The types of geometric features used in the chaining of the path determines what type of motion the robot uses - approaches would be joint movement, circles would be arc moves, and so on. These motion parameters can all be customized. The motion planner in itself then is the CAD/CAM system
Logged

________________________________________
AAS - Amp Aquisition Syndrome
asimo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 166


« Reply #16 on: February 29, 2008, 09:26:40 PM »

Thanks a lot for your answer TylerRobertson. As for the motion planner, do you know if it's possible to evaluate cycles time depending on the velocity and acceleration programmed in the software (imagine that I have different values in the same program)?

Thanks again!
Logged
TylerRobertson
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 26

www.inhousesolutions.com


WWW
« Reply #17 on: March 14, 2008, 05:56:32 PM »

hi asimo - sorry I didn't get back sooner:  motion planner is a typical to one offered in simulation only packages which slow down the programming process.  Our motion planner is less accurate but this is done to offer quicker programming.
Logged

________________________________________
AAS - Amp Aquisition Syndrome
jseger
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



« Reply #18 on: June 12, 2008, 04:00:30 PM »


If you want to play with robot geometry and dynamics you might want to look at Scilab and the RTSS toolbox. Both are free off the web.
You can do forward and inverse kinematics and simulation, transformations, quaternion/euler conversions, matrices etc. I've only been playing with it for about 3 months now, it does seem stable, well written and surprisingly powerful. They have a Puma 560 file built. I am a cheapskate.


I just downloaded scilab and rtss toolbox.  I'd like to learn more about it.  I haven't had time to mess with it.  Is there any advice you could give a newby?  I'm a little confused on how this could work for me or how I can utilize it.  Thanks.   
Logged
Jim Tyrer
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 384


If all else fails, read the manual.


« Reply #19 on: June 16, 2008, 06:33:30 PM »

I use it for calc'ing transforms, when you one taught point and you need a series of rotational motions before and/or after that one taught point. Like when snapping plastic parts together, or you could use it for welding paths, machining etc.....
If you want do fwd and inverse kinematics then 1st step would be to sit down and write a DH definition file for whatever robot arm you are using, and test it with a real bot or simulator.
It can simulate a custom "stick robot' that you can jog around, extract coords, get cycle times etc. The list goes on.
Logged
jseger
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



« Reply #20 on: June 19, 2008, 02:09:53 PM »

ok i'll mess around with it when i get a chance.  it messed with the robot demos in it and i haven't figured out exactly how its supposed to work.  i'll keep messing with it though.
Logged
DP
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2008, 04:19:17 PM »

I've been using RobotWorks for a year now, trimming and milling operations on a Motoman ES200N. Works as a bolt-on to SolidWorks. Simple to use and cheap, but beware - you pay peanuts, you get monkey service. The software is bugged to hell and back with random crashes and oddities. After-sales support is marvellous though.
Logged
jseger
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



« Reply #22 on: July 02, 2008, 07:17:24 PM »

Yes I've played with Robotworks before.  It has a TON of potential.  I liked it a lot.  Maybe I'll buy it someday.  I mean the company.   gibbo 
Logged
DP
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #23 on: July 03, 2008, 12:36:28 PM »

Yes I've played with Robotworks before.  It has a TON of potential.  I liked it a lot.  Maybe I'll buy it someday.  I mean the company.   gibbo 

Heh, I can put you in touch with Nathan, I'd love to be a fly on the wall for that conversation!

That Scilab and RTSS stuff sounds powerful, gonna download it later and have a mess! Cheers for the info.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!